This paper assesses the effects of body-worn cameras (BWC) on police behavior through a randomized control trial implemented in Rio de Janeiro. Results show that BWCs significantly reduced the use of lethal force and diminished the number of police written reports.
Beatriz Magaloni, Vanessa Melo, and Gustavo Robles
The excessive use of force by police officers is a pervasive problem in many democratic societies. One policy intended to decrease officers’ excessive use of force is the adoption of body-worn cameras (BWC) that can, among others, monitor police behavior and provide footage that could be used to sanction misconduct. BWCs have been adopted by many police departments in the US and in other countries. However, are BWCs effective at reducing unnecessary violence and increasing police compliance?
More than one-fifth of Brazil’s 2016 police killings occurred in Rio de Janeiro, where police killed close to 8,500 people in the past decade. The levels of officer-involved killings are associated with the militaristic approach of policing the favelas. In anticipation of the 2014 World Cup and the 2016 Olympics, the government of Rio de Janeiro instituted a far-reaching reform with the establishment and deployment of Pacifying Police Units (UPPs), a form of community-oriented policing.
Details of the Intervention
The study was conducted between December 2015 and November 2016, and involved 470 police officers from several units in the UPP Rocinha. Within each type of unit, we randomly assigned units (with 3 to 7 police officers per shift) into treatment and control groups. Treated units received body-worn cameras according to different protocols. Control units were not assigned cameras. To make comparisons within groups, we reassigned units to treatment and control groups at different stages of the study. This allowed us to compare camera usage and the use of force between units and to compare officers within the same unit at different points in time.
The study generates an intriguing conclusion: BWCs effectively reduce police officers’ use of lethal force even when they refused to turn the cameras on. Moreover, there are significantly fewer interactions with residents when police officers are wearing cameras. However, the consequences of police inactivity remain ambiguous. Therefore, we suggest: