WORK IN PROGRESS
Forthcoming Publications And Work In Progress
How body-worn cameras affect the use of gunshots, stop-and searches and other forms of police behavior: A Randomized Control Trial in Rio de Janeiro” (with Vanessa Melo and Gustavo Robles)

This paper assesses the effects of body-worn cameras (BWC) on police behavior through a randomized control trial implemented in Rio de Janeiro. Results show that BWCs significantly reduced the use of lethal force and diminished the number of police written reports.

Beatriz Magaloni, Vanessa Melo, and Gustavo Robles

 

Issue

The excessive use of force by police officers is a pervasive problem in many democratic societies. One policy intended to decrease officers’ excessive use of force is the adoption of body-worn cameras (BWC) that can, among others, monitor police behavior and provide footage that could be used to sanction misconduct. BWCs have been adopted by many police departments in the US and in other countries. However, are BWCs effective at reducing unnecessary violence and increasing police compliance?

 

Context

More than one-fifth of Brazil’s 2016 police killings occurred in Rio de Janeiro, where police killed close to 8,500 people in the past decade. The levels of officer-involved killings are associated with the militaristic approach of policing the favelas. In anticipation of the 2014 World Cup and the 2016 Olympics, the government of Rio de Janeiro instituted a far-reaching reform with the establishment and deployment of Pacifying Police Units (UPPs), a form of community-oriented policing. 

 

Details of the Intervention

The study was conducted between December 2015 and November 2016, and involved 470 police officers from several units in the UPP Rocinha. Within each type of unit, we randomly assigned units (with 3 to 7 police officers per shift) into treatment and control groups. Treated units received body-worn cameras according to different protocols. Control units were not assigned cameras. To make comparisons within groups, we reassigned units to treatment and control groups at different stages of the study. This allowed us to compare camera usage and the use of force between units and to compare officers within the same unit at different points in time.

 

Results

  • Protocol compliance is a critical problem.Despite the fact that the random assignment of BWCs was strictly conducted, most police officers refused to turn on their cameras.
  • BWCs reduced the use of lethal force. We find that BWCs had substantial effects on police officers’ use of lethal force. Officers who participated in the study were involved in 22 of the 28 incidents involving the use of force that occurred during the length of the study.
  • When restricting the sample to events involving the use of force, we find that police officers who wore BWCs used, on average, 40% less bullets than officers in the control group in incidences involving the use of lethal force.
  • BWCs inhibited police activity. Our results suggest that officers wearing BWCs reduced their regular policing activities and engaged in fewer interactions with the community, including stops-and-searches and arrests. We find the opposite effect among supervisors; in contrast, BWCs pressured them to increase their performance and productivity.

 

Conclusions 

The study generates an intriguing conclusion: BWCs effectively reduce police officers’ use of lethal force even when they refused to turn the cameras on. Moreover, there are significantly fewer interactions with residents when police officers are wearing cameras. However, the consequences of police inactivity remain ambiguous. Therefore, we suggest:

  • Institutional Engagement. Gaining support from high-rank superiors is not enough to successfully implement and manage BWCs. Institutional engagement must be achieved at all strategic levels within the agency to improve BWC effectiveness.
  • Infrastructure. Police departments should anticipate the infrastructural requirements needed to physically host, operate, and maintain BWC equipment. Physical infrastructure entails, but is not limited to: dock stations, cameras, wires, appliances, and a reliable internet connection
  • Design of protocols. To effectively manage BWCs, police corporations must design and publicize in advance protocols for camera usage.
  • Footage ManagementIt is imperative to develop a protocol to manage the images collected by BWCs during different types of daily interactions.
"What Drives Police Violence in Rio de Janeiro: The Use of Survey Evidence" (under review at the Latin American Research Review, with Ignacio Cano)
"Indigenous Autonomy, Self-Defense Groups and Organized Crime: The Case of Mexico" (with Kristof Gosztonyi, Alberto Diaz-Cayeros, and Cesangari Lopez-Martinez).
"Strengthening Life Skills for Youth in Places of Violence: Agencia de Redes para la Juventude in Rio’s favelas" (with Veriene Melo).
Can Non-Immigrant Guest Worker Programs Help Escape Violence and Poverty Traps? A Multiyear Project using a Randomized Control Trial Evaluation in the U.S. and Mexico (with Jonathan Furszyfer and Luis Rodríguez)
Police Violence, Organizational Networks and the Killer State in Rio de Janeiro (with Vanessa Melo)
“Mapping Criminal Governance: The Case of Rio de Janeiro” (with Edgar Franco and Vanessa Melo)